Institutional Governance and Smart Resource Management in Faisalabad’s Industrial Sector
Institutional Governance for Smart Industrial Management
Keywords:
Smart Governance, Institutional Reform, Resource Management, Technology Integration, Citizen Participation, Industrial GovernanceAbstract
Smart cities signal a clear shift in how urban and industrial spaces are governed, managed, and maintained, with digital innovation and participatory approaches at the center of decision-making. This paper examines how institutional governance can enable the adoption of smart city principles in the industrial sector of Faisalabad. The study draws on a structured review of peer-reviewed literature indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar published between 2020 and 2025, supplemented by relevant government and NGO reports. After applying defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, a thematic analysis was conducted to synthesize key insights.
The paper contributes to the literature by integrating Institutional Theory with Smart Governance Theory to explain how governance arrangements shape the effectiveness of digital technologies in industrial cities within developing economies. Findings highlight that technology-driven governance and active stakeholder engagement are critical for efficient resource management and sustainable industrial growth. Three coordination mechanisms emerge as central to improving governance outcomes: strong institutional coordination, digital transparency, and effective public-private partnerships.
Faisalabad’s industrial base, particularly its textile and export-oriented sectors, shows strong potential for transformation through smart resource management, including IoT-based monitoring, data-driven energy management, and digital waste systems. However, the study also identifies persistent institutional barriers, such as bureaucratic rigidity, weak data-sharing mechanisms, and limited inter-agency collaboration. Addressing these challenges requires integrated smart governance frameworks that align technological advancement with inclusive and accountable decision-making. Overall, the study adds context-specific evidence to global debates on smart governance, with relevance for developing economies where digital readiness and governance reforms are still evolving.
References
Aditya, T., Ningrum, S., & Nurasa, H. (2023). Community needs for the digital divide in smart city policy: A study from an Indonesian city. Heliyon, 9(8), e18932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18932
Ahmad, K., Elahi, M. M., & Khan, A. R. (2025). Smart governance in Pakistan: (Re-)thinking bureaucratic efficiency through AI integration. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 1684–1700. https://doi.org/10.59075/zyh56149
Aisyah, S., Hidaya, Z., and et al. (2024). Transforming smart city governance for quality of life and sustainable development in Semarang City, Indonesia. IETA Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
Atique, M. (2024). An analysis of e-governance in Pakistan from the lens of the public sector. Heliyon.
Bastos, D., Fernández-Caballero, A., Pereira, A., & Rocha, N. P. (2022). Smart city applications to promote citizen participation in city management and governance: A systematic review. Informatics, 9(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040089
Bokhari, S. A. A., & Myeong, S. (2024). How do institutional and technological innovations influence smart city governance? Focused on stakeholder satisfaction and crime rate. Sustainability, 16(10), 4246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104246
Bokhari, S. A. A., Park, S. Y., & Manzoor, S. (2025). Digital government transformation through artificial intelligence: The mediating role of stakeholder trust and participation. Digital, 5(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5030043
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bukhari, S., Kamran, S. M., Asif, M., Abro, M. M. Q., & Zaman, K. (2025). Engineering smart governance systems and e-government services for urban sustainability: A systems-based approach to SDG-aligned urban efficiency. Spectrum of Engineering Sciences, 3(4), 304–322.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
Farooq, M. S., Abdullah, M., Riaz, S., Alvi, A., Rustam, F., López Flores, M. A., … Ashraf, I. (2023). A survey on the role of industrial IoT in manufacturing for implementation of smart industry. Sensors, 23(21), 8958. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218958
Fatima, R. B., Sayed, S., Sajid, M. A., & Ali, S. (2025). Assessing the impact of digital governance on citizen participation and public service delivery: A comparative study of developing and developed countries. Review Journal of Social Psychology & Social Works, 3(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.71145/rjsp.v3i1.80
Haider, Z., Shuwen, C., & Hyder, S. (2014). Citizens’ participation in e-government services: Comparative study of Pakistan & Singapore. IOSR-JECE, 9(6), 35–48.
Hardi, R., Nurmandi, A., Purwaningsih, T., & Manaf, H. (2025). Smart city governance and interoperability: Enhancing human security in Yogyakarta and Makassar, Indonesia. Frontiers in Political Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1553177
Islamic Republic of Pakistan, JICA. (n.d.). Project for water supply, sewerage and drainage master plan of Faisalabad.
Kaponda, T. (2025). From new public management to digital public administration: Examining the role of technology in shaping super smart societies. IJRISS, 9(5), 3306–3320. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000257
Khalid, A., & others. (2025). Inadequate governance of urban ecosystems in Lahore. Urban Science, 9(5), 162.
Kitagawa, F. (2025). Smart cities as “mission-oriented” innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaf019
Lawrence, T. B., & Shadnam, M. (2008). Institutional theory. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 5, pp. 2288–2293). Blackwell.
Lim, B., Yigitcanlar, T. (2022). Participatory governance of smart cities: Insights from e-participation. Journal / MDPI.
Majid, M. I., Malik, E., Aslam, T., Mahfooz, O., & Maqbool, F. (2022). Design and implementation of low-cost data acquisition system for SMEs in Pakistan. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, 59(4), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(59-4)784
Maulana, R. Y., Marjamat, U., Subekti, D., & Wicaksono, A. (2025). Catalyzing digital transformation through smart cities initiatives in Indonesian local government. Smart Cities and Regional Development, 9(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.25019/59kh3t06
Memon, B., Hakro, D. N., Ujjan, I., & Abbasi, S. (2025). A behaviorally-driven software architecture for e-government adoption in Pakistan. VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(2).
Myeong, S., & Bokhari, S. A. A. (2023). Building participative e-governance in smart cities: Moderating role of institutional and technological innovation. Sustainability, 15(20), 15075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015075
Nadeem, M., Matsuyuki, M. (2025). Institutional challenges and opportunities for encouraging transit-oriented development in Lahore. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives.
Raza, I. (2020). Digital divide and e-governance in Pakistan: Factors affecting the citizen portal app. (MPhil thesis, PIDE).
Razzak, A., Haneef, A., Ahmed, W., & Ayub, A. (n.d. 2023). Pakistan aqua surveillance and control using IoT and LoRa protocol. IJCRT.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (8th ed.).Pearson. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240218229_Research_Methods_for_Business_Students
Siddiqui, A. A., Rehman, S. S. U., & Ansari, M. I. (2025). The future of e-governance in Pakistan: Current status and future direction. Journal of Political Stability Archive. https://doi.org/10.63468/jpsa.3.4.10
Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. MDPI https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030899
Temoor bin Aslam, Salman, Y., Irfan, S., & Jabeen, N. (2018). Smart cities – A multidisciplinary perspectives model. South Asian Studies, 33(2), 435–459.
Transforming digital government in Pakistan: Challenges & citizen participation. Centre for Peace & Development Initiatives (2021). https://mjmsear.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Transforming-Digital-Government-in-Pakistan-August-2021-Final.pdf
Waheed, F., Omar, M., Ibrahim, S. Z., Chugtai, R., & Aejaz, S. H. (2023). Application of industrial IoT in developing a sustainable and automatic liquid filling plant. Pakistan Journal of Scientific Research, 3(1), 130–140.
WWF Pakistan. (n.d. 2023). Integrated Local Environmental Strategies (ILES) – Textile Sector.https://wwfasia.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/annual-report-2023_compressed--1-.pdf
Xu, Y., Zuo, J., & Zhao, R. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(3), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030899
Yaseen, A., Nawaz, A., & Zhaira, D. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on public sector governance in Pakistan. Journal of Neonatal Surgery. https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i2S.9220
Zhang, H. (2022). Digital transformation of smart industries and transformation of smart city governance models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet Technology, Big Data & Security.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
This is a review paper that does not contain any data.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright for articles published in AgriPaT is retained by the authors. However, the authors grant The AgEcon Frontiers sPvt. Ltd., the publisher of AgriPaT, the non-exclusive right to publish, archive, and distribute the final version of the manuscript in all forms and media. All works are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and the source are properly cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in AgriPaT are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
