Carbon and Water Footprints of Cotton Production in Punjab, Pakistan: Implications for Climate-Smart Agricultural Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66529/agripat.2026.2.3.96Keywords:
Cotton; Carbon Footprint; Water Footprint; Climate-Smart Agriculture; Punjab; Agricultural Policy; PakistanAbstract
Cotton is a cornerstone of Pakistan’s agricultural economy and textile industry, yet its production contributes substantially to greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption. This study assessed the carbon footprint (CF), water footprint (WF), and water-use efficiency (WUE) of cotton production among 200 farm households in District Vehari, Punjab, categorized as small, medium, and large farms. Results showed an average carbon footprint of 613.2 kg CO₂-eq per acre, with electricity, diesel, and urea accounting for nearly 89% of total emissions. Significant differences in CF and WUE were observed across farm sizes, while the average water footprint of seed cotton (7.23 m³/kg) did not vary significantly. Regression analysis revealed that farm size and education positively influenced CF, whereas household income had a negative effect. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions in irrigation management, energy use, input efficiency, and extension services. The study provides farm-size-specific evidence to support climate-smart cotton production and sustainable resource management in Pakistan.
References
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Chapagain, A. K., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2004). Water footprints of nations (Value of Water Research Report Series No. 16). UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education.
Chapagain, A. K., Hoekstra, A. Y., Savenije, H. H. G., & Gautam, R. (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Dyer, J. A., & Desjardins, R. L. (2003). The impact of farm machinery management on greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 22(3), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v22n03_07
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2010). CROPWAT 8.0 model. FAO Land and Water Division.
Garcia, C. A., Fuentes, A., Hennecke , A., Riegelhaupt, E., Manzini, F. & Masera, O. (2011). Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico. Applied Energy, 88(6), 2088-2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.072
Germanwatch. (2025). Global Climate Risk Index 2025. Germanwatch e.V.
Government of Pakistan. (2024). Pakistan Economic Survey 2023–24. Ministry of Finance, Finance Division.
Hillier, J., Walter, C., Malin, D., Garcia-Suarez, T., Mila-i-Canals, L., & Smith, P. (2013). A farm-focused calculator for emissions from crop and livestock production. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(9), 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.014
Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2011). The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Earthscan.
Hoekstra, A. Y., & Hung, P. Q. (2002). Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade (Value of Water Research Report Series No. 11). IHE Delft.
Imran, M. A., Ali, A., Ashfaq, M., Hassan, S., Culas, R., & Ma, C. (2018). Impact of climate smart agriculture (CSA) practices on cotton production and livelihood of farmers in Punjab, Pakistan. Sustainability, 10(6), 2101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062101
Imran, M. A., Ali, A., Culas, R. J., Ashfaq, M., Baig, I. A., Nasir, S., & Hashmi, A. H. (2022). Sustainability and efficiency analysis with respect to adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in Pakistan: A group-wise comparison of adopters and conventional farmers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29,19337-19351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17181-3
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis (Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report). Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis (Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Jamil, I., Jun, W., Mughal, B., Waheed, J., Hussain, H., & Waseem, M. (2021). Agricultural innovation: A comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices. Land Use Policy, 108, Article 105581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105581
Kaur, S., Sidana, B. K., Kaur, S., & Biswas, A. (2025). Carbon footprint reduction in Punjab agriculture: Analyzing impacts and strategies in major crop rotations. Energy Nexus, 18, Article 100424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100424
Khan, Y., & Ali, Y. (2024). Analysis of water footprint and sustainability of the cotton supply chain in Pakistan. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 9, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-024-00252-0
Komleh, S. P., Sefeedpari, P. & Ghahderijani, M. (2012). Exploring energy consumption and CO2 emission of cotton production in Iran. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 4(3), 033115. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4727906
Lal, R. (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 30(7), 981–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005
Makhdum, A. H., Khan, H. N., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Reducing cotton footprints through implementation of better management practices in cotton production: A step towards better cotton initiative. In Proceedings of the Fifth Meeting of the Asian Cotton Research and Development Network (pp. 1–18). International Cotton Advisory Committee.
Maraseni, T. N., Cockfield, G., & Maroulis, J. (2010). An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian cotton industry. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 148(5):501-510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960999058X
Ministry of National Food Security and Research. (2025). Agriculture sector performance review, fiscal year 2024–25. Government of Pakistan.
Pandey, D., Agrawal, M., & Pandey, J. S. (2011). Carbon footprint: Current methods of estimation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 178(1–4), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y
Pathak, H., & Wassmann, R. (2007). Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: I. Generation of technical coefficients. Agricultural Systems, 94(3), 807–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.015
Schultz, T. W. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. Yale University Press.
United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. (2025). Cotton and products annual: Pakistan (GAIN Report No. PK2025-0002). USDA FAS.
Visser, G. F. (2014). The development of a crop carbon management model to add value to agricultural products through the reduction in Greenhouse Gas emission levels. PhD Dissertation, The University of Queensland, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13413
Watto, M. A., & Mugera, A. W. (2015). Econometric estimation of groundwater irrigation efficiency of cotton cultivation farms in Pakistan. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 4, 193–211. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2014.328
Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of carbon footprint. In C. C. Pertsova (Ed.), Ecological economics research trends (pp. 1–11). Nova Science Publishers.
World Bank. (2023). Pakistan floods 2022: Post-disaster needs assessment. World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2024). Punjab Resilient and Inclusive Agriculture Transformation Project: Project appraisal document (Report No. PAD4876). World Bank Group.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain the copyright of their published work and grant the journal the right of first publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, the content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license allows use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that you give proper credit to the original author(s) and source, include a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate any modifications made.
