Comparative Laboratory and Field Bioefficacy of Seven Binary Insecticide Formulations Against a Field Population of Spodoptera frugiperda in Punjab, Pakistan

Authors

  • Muhammad Usman Azam student Author
  • Muhammad Dildar Gogi Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Hamid Bashir Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Ali Hasnain Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66529/agripat.2026.2.5.142

Keywords:

Spodoptera frugiperda, binary insecticide formulations, bioefficacy, maize, LC50, integrated pest management

Abstract

Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) threatens maize in Pakistan, and growers rely on binary premixed insecticides for which local efficacy data are scarce. We evaluated seven binary formulations against a Sahiwal-derived field population in laboratory bioassays and a field experiment. Third-, fourth- and fifth-instar larvae were exposed to five concentrations (0.25–4× the recommended field rate; three cups of ten larvae per treatment), and mortality was recorded up to 168 h. Field plots (three blocks) were assessed 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment (DAT); blocks and repeated measures were not modeled. Third-instar mortality rose from 22.7% at 0.25× to 77.7% at 4× (partial η² = 0.74–0.78 across instars). LC50 values ranged from 0.86 to 1.74× the recommended rate with overlapping fiducial limits; because exposure route (leaf dip versus diet) is confounded with formulation, no product is ranked as more potent, and LC90 estimates lie beyond the tested range. Pupation of fifth-instar survivors fell from 82.3% (control) to 33–38%. In the field, treated plots had 1.02–1.15 larvae per plant at 14 DAT versus 4.37 in controls (about 73–77% fewer), without differences among formulations when pooled; significant insecticide × concentration interactions make this pooled comparison incomplete. Control mortality (up to 17.7%) and unrecovered field-method details limit interpretation. These results are a local benchmark, not evidence of resistance status, synergism or yield protection.

References

Abbas, A., Hafeez, F., Hasnain, A., Iftikhar, A., Khan, M. H., Ullah, F., Elkady, A. M. M., Zhao, C. R., & Sun, X. (2025). Chlorantraniliprole resistance and associated fitness costs in fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda): Implications for resistance management. Insects, 16(12), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16121232

Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18(2), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/18.2.265a

Deshmukh, S., Pavithra, H. B., Kalleshwaraswamy, C. M., Shivanna, B. K., Maruthi, M. S., & Mota-Sanchez, D. (2020). Field efficacy of insecticides for management of invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on maize in India. Florida Entomologist, 103(2), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.0211

Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Gilal, A. A., Bashir, L., Faheem, M., Rajput, A., Soomro, J. A., Kunbhar, S., Mirwani, A. S., Zahra, T., Mastoi, G. S., & Sahito, J. G. M. (2020). First record of invasive fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)) in corn fields of Sindh, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 33(2), 247–252.

Goergen, G., Kumar, P. L., Sankung, S. B., Togola, A., & Tamò, M. (2016). First report of outbreaks of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a new alien invasive pest in West and Central Africa. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0165632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165632

Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.

Government of Pakistan, Finance Division. (2024). Pakistan economic survey 2023–24: Agriculture (Chapter 2). https://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapter_24/2_agriculture.pdf Accessed on 06.09.2026.

Guedes, R. N. C., Smagghe, G., Stark, J. D., & Desneux, N. (2016). Pesticide-induced stress in arthropod pests for optimized integrated pest management programs. Annual Review of Entomology, 61, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023646

Guo, Z., Tang, J., Ma, H., Wu, M., He, S., Wan, H., Ma, K., & Li, J. (2024). Investigation of lambda-cyhalothrin resistance in Spodoptera frugiperda: Heritability, cross-resistance, and mechanisms. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 202, 105916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.105916

Insecticide Resistance Action Committee. (2026). IRAC mode of action classification scheme (Version 11.5). https://irac-online.org/documents/moa-classification Accessed on 06.09.2026.

Khan, H. A. A., & Ali, A. (2025). First report of field-evolved resistance to insecticides in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Punjab, Pakistan. PLoS ONE, 20(6), e0324857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324857

Prasanna, B. M., Huesing, J. E., Eddy, R., & Peschke, V. M. (Eds.). (2018). Fall armyworm in Africa: A guide for integrated pest management (1st ed.). CIMMYT.

Richardson, E. B., Troczka, B. J., Gutbrod, O., Davies, T. G. E., & Nauen, R. (2020). Diamide resistance: 10 years of lessons from lepidopteran pests. Journal of Pest Science, 93, 911–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01220-y

Salamat, R., Saddiq, B., Afzal, M. B. S., Banazeer, A., Serrão, J. E., Akram, M. I., Sajjad, A., Younus, M., & Sial, A. A. (2025). Resistance of Spodoptera frugiperda to the diamides chlorantraniliprole and flubendiamide: Resistance development, heritability, inheritance and implications for management. Journal of Economic Entomology, 118(6), 3157–3172. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf240

Sharanabasappa, S. D., Kalleshwaraswamy, C. M., Asokan, R., Mahadeva Swamy, H. M., Maruthi, M. S., Pavithra, H. B., Hegde, K., Navi, S., Prabhu, S. T., & Goergen, G. (2018). First report of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), an alien invasive pest on maize in India. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems, 24(1), 23–29

Sisay, B., Tefera, T., Wakgari, M., Ayalew, G., & Mendesil, E. (2019). The efficacy of selected synthetic insecticides and botanicals against fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in maize. Insects, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10020045

Tajdar, A., Cao, C., Abbas, K., Zaib, M. S., Safeer, H. M., Zaka, S. M., Shi, W., & Jaleel, W. (2025). Monitoring activity of Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) in different areas of maize crops and its pesticide susceptibility testing under controlled conditions. Journal of Toxicology, 2025, 6651151. https://doi.org/10.1155/jt/6651151

Tay, W. T., Meagher, R. L., Czepak, C., & Groot, A. T. (2023). Spodoptera frugiperda: Ecology, evolution, and management options of an invasive species. Annual Review of Entomology, 68, 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-102548

Tukey, J. W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparisons [Unpublished manuscript]. Princeton University.

Waldbauer, G. P. (1968). The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology, 5, 229–288.

Zhang, J., Jiang, J., Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., & Yu, N. (2022). A binary mixture of emamectin benzoate and chlorantraniliprole supplemented with an adjuvant effectively controls Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects, 13(12), 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121157

Downloads

Published

2026-10-28

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly deposited in a repository but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Comparative Laboratory and Field Bioefficacy of Seven Binary Insecticide Formulations Against a Field Population of Spodoptera frugiperda in Punjab, Pakistan. (2026). Journal of Agricultural Policy and Transformation, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.66529/agripat.2026.2.5.142