Public Perceptions of Local Government in Pakistan: A Survey-Based Assessment
Public Perceptions of Local Government in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66529/agripat.2026.2.2.77Keywords:
Local government, decentralization, public participation, service delivery, accountability, Pakistan.Abstract
Decentralization is theorized to improve service delivery and democratic accountability, yet evidence from citizen perspectives remains scarce in many developing contexts. This study investigates public perceptions of local government in Pakistan across four dimensions: awareness, service delivery, civic participation, and institutional trust. Drawing on survey data from 180 respondents across multiple districts, the study employs descriptive statistics and reliability analysis (Cronbach's α = 0.916). Findings reveal that while basic awareness of local government existence is moderate (mean = 3.81/5.00), deeper structural and functional knowledge remains limited. Service delivery satisfaction is low, with over 40% dissatisfaction regarding rural roads and development projects. Civic participation is confined to electoral turnout, with minimal engagement in ongoing governance processes. Trust is mixed: citizens acknowledge some responsiveness but widely perceive political interference, weak anti-corruption mechanisms, and non-meritocratic selection. These findings suggest that Pakistan faces not institutional absence, but what we term 'decentralization without transparency' characterized by information asymmetries and procedural illegibility. The study concludes with policy implications for institutional clarity, merit-based recruitment, and citizen feedback mechanisms.
References
Al-Zahrani, K. H., Khan, A. Q., Baig, M. B., Mubushar, M., & Herab, A. H. (2019). Perceptions of wheat farmers toward agricultural extension services for realizing sustainable biological yields. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(7), 1503-1508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.02.002
Ali, M., & Rafi, S. (2026). Exploring the Impact of Decentralization on Public Service Delivery in Pakistan, with a Focus on Local Governance. Social Science Review Archives, 4(1), 2658-2669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v4i1.1821
Cheema, A. R., Ahmad, I., & Mehmood, A. (2024). Aligning local governance with SDGs: a study of local government systems in Pakistan. Development Studies Research, 11(1), 2414028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2024.2414028
Cheema, A., Khwaja, A. I., & Qadir, A. (2006). Local government reforms in Pakistan: context, content and causes. Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective, 2, 257-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2297.003.0009
Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1804036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
Ebenstein, A., Fan, M., Greenstone, M., He, G., & Zhou, M. (2017). New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River Policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(39), 10384-10389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616784114
Faguet, J. P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
Farooqi, S., & Forbes, T. (2024). Exploring Citizen Initiated Contacts and the Role of Local Councilors in Problem Resolution: Evidence From Pakistan. Administration & Society, 56(2), 203-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231213644
Jameel, A. (2026). A Critical Analysis of Primary and Secondary Education Policies in Pakistan: A Retrospective on Objectives, Governance, and Outcomes. In Education Policies and Practices in the Global South, Volume One: Basic Education (pp. 171-204). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-3268-1_11
Kameshwara, K. K., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Shields, R., & Dhanda, K. R. (2020). A false promise? Decentralization in education systems across the globe. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101669
Kassem, H. S., Alotaibi, B. A., Muddassir, M., & Herab, A. (2021). Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 85, 101912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101912
Khan, M., Kasmi, J., Saboor, A., & Ali, I. (2020). A comparative analysis of the government and ngos in delivering quality services for the rural people of Pakistan: Community Perspectives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development, 30(1-2), 203-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1018529120977260
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Baldé, A. B., & Zhong, M. (2018). The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. The lancet, 391(10119), 462-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing development: Does participation work?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8256-1
Messina, J. P., Brady, O. J., Golding, N., Kraemer, M. U., Wint, G. W., Ray, S. E., & Hay, S. I. (2019). The current and future global distribution and population at risk of dengue. Nature microbiology, 4(9), 1508-1515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0476-8
Mookherjee, D. (2015). Political decentralization. Annual review of economics, 7(1), 231-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115527
Shah, A. (Ed.). (2006). Local governance in developing countries. World Bank Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6565-6
Troeger, C., Forouzanfar, M., Rao, P. C., Khalil, I., Brown, A., Reiner, R. C., & Mokdad, A. H. (2017). Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet infectious diseases, 17(9), 909-948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30276-1
Zahra, A., & Bouckaert, G. (2022). Reforming structures and procedures in Pakistan (1947–2018). In Public sector reforms in Pakistan: Hierarchies, markets and networks (pp. 55-92). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96825-0_3
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain the copyright of their published work and grant the journal the right of first publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in AgriPaT are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
