An Empirical Analysis of Financial Development, Energy Consumption, and Ecological Footprint in Pakistan
Finance, Energy Use and Ecological Footprint in Pakistan
Keywords:
Financial development; Renewable energy; Ecological footprint; Economic growth; Trade opennessAbstract
Environmental degradation poses serious challenges to sustainable development in Pakistan, where economic expansion, financial sector growth, and rising energy demand place increasing pressure on natural resources. This study examines the relationships among financial development, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, trade openness, ecological footprint, and economic growth using annual data for the period 1990–2019. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach is employed to explore both short-run and long-run dynamics among the variables. The empirical findings reveal that non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth significantly increase the ecological footprint, indicating greater environmental pressure. In contrast, renewable energy consumption and trade openness contribute to environmental improvement by reducing ecological degradation. Financial development shows a favorable environmental effect in the short run; however, its long-run impact on environmental quality is statistically weak. The results further indicate that financial development, renewable energy use, non-renewable energy use, and trade openness positively contribute to economic growth. Overall, the findings suggest that economic growth alone is insufficient to ensure environmental sustainability. A structural transformation of the energy system is necessary, with greater reliance on renewable energy sources. The study recommends promoting green financing, strengthening environmental regulations, and encouraging the adoption of energy-efficient technologies to achieve long-term sustainable development in Pakistan.
References
Abbasi, F., & Riaz, K. (2016). CO₂ emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: An augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy, 90, 102–114.
Acheampong, A. O. (2019). Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Economics, 83, 156–179.
Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., Menyah, K., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2255–2260.
Baloch, M. H., Kaloi, G. S., & Memon, Z. A. (2016). Current scenario of the wind energy in Pakistan: Challenges and future perspectives. Energy Reports, 2, 201–210.
Danish, & Wang, Z. (2019). Investigation of the ecological footprint’s driving factors: What we learn from the experience of emerging economies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101626.
Dogan, E., Taspinar, N., & Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2019). Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy & Environment, 30(6), 1065–1086.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
Sadorsky, P. (2010). The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2528–2535.
Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 862–871.
Sheikh, M. A. (2010). Energy and renewable energy scenario of Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 354–363.
Solarin, S. A., & Bello, M. O. (2018). Persistence of policy shocks to an environmental degradation index: The case of ecological footprint in 128 developed and developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 89, 35–44.
Stern, D. I., & Cleveland, C. J. (2004). Energy and economic growth. Encyclopedia of Energy, 35–51. Elsevier.
Tamazian, A., & Rao, B. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137–145.
Ulucak, R., & Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144–157.
Yilanci, V., Gorus, M. S., & Aydin, M. (2019). Are shocks to ecological footprint in OECD countries permanent or temporary? Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 270–281.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data used in this study are publicly available from the Global Footprint Network (GFPN), World Development Indicators (WDI), and International Monetary Fund (IMF) databases. All data sources are cited in the manuscript, and the dataset can be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain the copyright of their published work and grant the journal the right of first publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in AgriPaT are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
